Dan Sugalski writes: : Nah, bytecode'll have an endianness marker at the top. If you load in : bytecode with the wrong endianness, the loader will have to swap for you. Er. If they're not bytes, we can't call it bytecode. Larry
- Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Uri Guttman
- RE: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Hong Zhang
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- RE: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Larry Wall
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Nathan Torkington
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Uri Guttman
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Uri Guttman
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Uri Guttman
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski