On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 11:25:09AM +0100, Dave Mitchell wrote: > This is the bit that scares me about unifying perl ops and regex ops: > can we really unify them without taking a performance hit? Coupl'a things: firstly, we can make Perl 6 ops as lightweight as we like. Second, Ruby uses a giant switch instead of function pointers for their op despatch loop; Matz says it doesn't make that much difference in terms of performance. I don't know if I've mentioned this before, but http://www-6.ibm.com/jp/developerworks/linux/001027/ruby_qa.html was my interview with Matsumoto about his ideas for Perl 6 and his experiences from Ruby. It's in Japanese, so http://www.excite.co.jp/world/url/ may help. -- Familiarity breeds facility. -- Megahal (trained on asr), 1998-11-06
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Uri Guttman
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Larry Wall
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Larry Wall
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dave Mitchell
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Simon Cozens
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dave Mitchell
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dave Storrs
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Dan Sugalski
- RE: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Hong Zhang
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Graham Barr
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) David L. Nicol
- Re: Stacks, registers, and bytecode. (Oh, my!) Graham Barr
