At 09:58 PM 7/7/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote: > >>>>> "PJ" == Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > PJ> Some method of attaching a callback function to arbitrary opcodes would > PJ> be very useful. > >how would you propose those callbacks be attached without op codes to do >the callback? :) You override the opcode function and push your function on top of the stack. :) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Paul Johnson
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Simon Cozens
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Uri Guttman
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Simon Cozens
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Dan Sugalski
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Uri Guttman
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Dan Sugalski
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Rocco Caputo
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Uri Guttman
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Paul Johnson
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Uri Guttman
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Dan Sugalski
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Uri Guttman
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Dan Sugalski
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Paul Johnson
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Dan Sugalski
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Uri Guttman