At 09:58 PM 7/7/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> >>>>> "PJ" == Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> PJ> Some method of attaching a callback function to arbitrary opcodes would
> PJ> be very useful.
>
>how would you propose those callbacks be attached without op codes to do
>the callback? :)
You override the opcode function and push your function on top of the stack. :)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Paul Johnson
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Simon Cozens
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Uri Guttman
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Simon Cozens
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Dan Sugalski
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Uri Guttman
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Dan Sugalski
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Rocco Caputo
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Uri Guttman
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Paul Johnson
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Uri Guttman
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Dan Sugalski
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Uri Guttman
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Dan Sugalski
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Paul Johnson
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Dan Sugalski
- Re: Between-Opcode Callbacks Uri Guttman
