Bryan C. Warnock writes: > It's not a prioirty, but it's so much easier to walk the correct path from > the start. Since it's all Parrot, it's even easier. I agree. How about this: when the code is available (i.e., this afternoon), why don't you sit down with whoever else feels passionately about this, and add the namespace protection? There's no reason why it can't be added early, and I agree with Simon that he has higher priority things to worry about, but there's no reason why you or anyone else can't add it in. And it should be easy to add it in while the codebase is small. Namespace protection seems tricky. You need a list of symbols, categorized public or private. You need to automatically check the symbol list (e.g., output of nm) to see you're not exporting un-prefixed symbols. And so on. The more of this stuff that can be automated, the better. Go to it! Nat
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Simon Cozens
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Dave Mitchell
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Dan Sugalski
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Dan Sugalski
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Nathan Torkington
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Simon Cozens
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Dan Sugalski
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Nathan Torkington
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Simon Cozens
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Dan Sugalski
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Nathan Torkington
- Re: Muddled Boundaries - Perl 6 vs Parrot Simon Cozens