On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 05:27 PM 9/19/2001 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > >I think it's more urgent that we think about having the bytecode written in > >native IVs rather than 32 bits; that'll help Tru64 and all the other things > >with alignment problems. > Sure. That's a matter of getting assemble.pl using the right size for the > chosen IV. Configure.pl probably ought to handle that somewhere. Of course it doesn't help that perl doesn't have a pack() flag for IV :-). -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Hong Zhang
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Jarkko Hietaniemi
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Simon Cozens
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Gibbs Tanton - tgibbs
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Simon Cozens
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Andy Dougherty
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Hong Zhang
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Andy Dougherty
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Dan Sugalski
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Andy Dougherty
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax
- Re: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Simon Cozens
- RE: [PATCH] changing IV to opcode_t!! Brent Dax