At 03:17 PM 11/16/2001 -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>I like the idea of splitting out some things (such as dynaloading) into
>separate directories, instead of a single monolithic platform.c file.
>Whether *every* non-portable function needs its own directory is a
>different question. I suspect not, but it's clearly a matter of taste and
>balance just where to draw the line.
That's a good point. The big things (async I/O, dynaloading, and subprocess
creation and communication come to mind as biggies) can be taken as
separate things rather than treating platforms separately.
We'd end up with a mix of per-platform and per-style code, though, so I'm
not sure if it'd be a win.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
