At 03:01 AM 12/31/2001 -0500, Sam Tregar wrote:
>After reading that I'm only left wondering how this concept connects with
>continuations. Something tells me that if we implement continuations then
>coroutines and generators will fall out nearly for free. On the other
>hand, if we don't do continuations then I think this will be quite hard.
>Simply put, either we figure out how to package up program state into a
>nice package or we don't. Um, I think.
Parrot's doing coroutines and continuations. It's one of the things that's
making the sub calling bits a little interesting. (You can do them all with
continuations, but those are really overkill for generators, which you'd
kinda like to be efficient if at all possible)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
