At 03:23 PM 1/1/2002 +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote: >The appended patch silences the warnings in what I believe is a correct way >[opcode_t will never have more than 32 bits of information, will it?
In, thanks. (And no, it won't)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
