At 06:59 PM 2/16/2002 -0800, Steve Fink wrote:
>Anyone object to eliminating the need for the 'struct'?
>-struct Parrot_Interp {
>+typedef struct Parrot_Interp {
> struct IReg int_reg;
> struct NReg num_reg;
> struct SReg string_reg;
>@@ -87,7 +86,7 @@
> void *current_package; /* The package we're currently in */
> UINTVAL string_count;
> UINTVAL pmc_count;
>-};
>+} Parrot_Interp;
Didn't Brent Dax propose something about calling it Parrot? In either case,
I prefer the typedef, but I vote for Parrot without the _Interp.
Cheers,
-Melvin
