At 10:26 AM -0800 2/26/02, Brent Dax wrote:
>That'll just give us an explosion of wrapper types.
Not wrapper types, no. But 'different' types, yes.
Extenders will probably see things like:
typedef void PMC;
or
typedef char PMC;
rather than the actual struct.
>Like it or not,
>embedders (and extenders--don't forget about them) will need to do some
>simple operations on PMCs and strings. We need to accommodate that.
Right, but that's what the wrapper library is for. We will have a lot
of simple functions that have just a line or two of real code behind
them. That's OK--it's the only way to guarantee backwards
compatibility in the future.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
