Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would expect that should be fine, stdarg is one of the 4 headers that > are guaranteed by ANSI C89 even on a free standing environment (read > embedded targets, etc.)
> Its integral to C, and if you don't have it, I suppose the question > would be why we should port to it. Basically, whether you can use <stdarg.h> is directly tied to whether you want to support K&R compilers. If you want to support K&R, you have to allow for the possibility of <varargs.h> instead. If you are willing to require an ANSI C compiler (which I believe was the decision already made), <stdarg.h> is safe. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
