On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 06:01:56PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > Seriously though - is it possible to automate testing how many ops don't > have tests? That way we could have a test that looked for untested ops, and > failed if any weren't tested. > I guess it couldn't easily be very sophisticated, in that it would really only > have to verify that all ops were mentioned somewhere in the body of a test, > but I think it could be quite useful.
Or looking at it from the other end... automated coverage analysis of executed code would be a useful addition. Post processing the results could yield per-op, or at least per pmc, coverage value. I know coverage analysis isn't perfect but for ops in particular the devil is in the details and the edge cases are important. Tim.
