On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Brent Dax wrote:

> David M. Lloyd:
> # On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Brent Dax wrote:
> #
> # > Er, what patch?
> #
> # It was attached because it is 214K.  I could resend with it
> # inline if nobody minds the large message body.
>
> I don't think anybody minds an attached patch, but I didn't get the
> attachment.

Outlook users beware: Attachments sent using Pine (my mailer) tend to be
somewhat invisible to you.  They don't appear in the message list but
they're there.  You have to open up the message and (I think)  click on
the paperclip icon to get at them.  Or something like that.

- D

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to