At 06:34 PM 6/21/2002 +0200, Jerome Vouillon wrote: >On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 12:26:11AM -0400, Melvin Smith wrote: > > Given that it seems capturing and restoring a context is the most > > expensive part, should we make default routines lightweight (execute > > on caller stack rather than getting their own) and only make > > continuations and co-routines take most of the penalty? > >- Default routines should be lightweight.
Agree. >- Each co-routine should probably have its own interpreter. I'm not sure about this one. I think we can accomplish it without the full overhead of a new interpreter. -Melvin
