Florian Haeglsperger wrote: > But isn't this partly addressed with COW? > . . . > Thus I don't see a very big performance win in introducing mutable > strings.
Good point. But some people maintain that there could be a need for truly "constant" strings, that should never be modified, and any attempt to do so, even under COW, should fail. -- John Douglas Porter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com
