On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 12:07:57AM -0700, Steve Fink wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:19:45PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:09:54AM +0000, Simon Glover wrote: > > > Here's a brief test for the PMC, PMC, PMC form of the sprintf op; > > > as an added bonus, it also tests two of the formats not previously > > > tested (%b and %o). > > > > Thanks, applied > > Can you (and everyone else) also update RT when applying patches? The > process, as I understand it, is:
Thanks for this clear explanation of the process. I knew I was supposed to do "something" but it was never quite clear what. > 3. If the patch has a ticket number associated with it, find it in the > list at <http://www.parrotcode.org/openpatches>. Click on the > appropriate ticket link. I found the search by patch number can be useful when the patch number isn't obviously in the list of recent open patches > To explain the comment in #2 -- currently, RT helpfully re-opens a > ticket if there is further discussion after the ticket is closed > (resolved). So if you do the RT stuff first, and then send a "Thanks, > applied" message to the list, Mr. RT_System will reset the status to > "Open". Robert's going to disable this eventually, but he is currently > laboring under the misconception that his life involves a purpose > other than maintaining software for Parrot. I'm sure he'll return to > insanity soon, but even then he has some other stuff to get to first. Well, he has been very helpful in getting http://www.perl.org/advocacy/spoofathon/ up and fixing my content errors. Nicholas Clark -- INTERCAL better than perl? http://www.perl.org/advocacy/spoofathon/
