On Jan-01, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Steve Fink wrote: > > >On Jan-01, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > > >>I know, that things get worse with optimization and with more complex > >>programs. > > >And with other architectures that make heavier use of registers -- > >i386 may be an unrealistic example, since not much can even fit into > >the available register set. > > > Yep. The goal can only be, to either have *all* code paths that might > trigger DOD checked, or use one of the mentioned strategies. Though > reducing possibilities of infant mortatility by early anchoring is IMHO > always a good thing: it would e.g. help active pinning.
Could you expand on that? What's "active pinning"?
