Thanks Dan. One little picky thing what is the naming convention for ops?
Good question--there really isn't one. I've been trying to avoid underscores in names, since it was inconvenient when the assembler was trying to figure out if you were using a base name or an expanded name, but that's about it.
I'm up for suggestions.
Also, should the current 'invoke' op be changed to 'call'? I don't care exactly what the names are, but consistency is nice.
Yeah, I think so. I originally figured that invoke would be different than call, but at this point they aren't, and I don't see any reason they would be. So we might as well rename invoke and be done with it.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
