On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 12:15:21AM +0000, Clinton A. Pierce wrote: > Causes IMCC to segfault. Asking IMCC to generate pasm produces reasonable > code:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 09:35:18AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Clinton A. Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > .sub _main > > .sub dummy > > call inner1 > > call inner2 > > You have to used global labels for subroutines, then all is fine. But being able to craft input that causes IMCC to segfault (actually any form of segfault) is bad on principle, isn't it? Nicholas Clark
