Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Likewise, if I declare the .pcc_sub to be non_prototyped (so that both > the call and declaration are non_prototyped), I get the same error:
Non-protyped returns are not implemented. > I'll throw in one more thing just because I know a certain Mr. P. > Cawley dearly loves people to pile unrelated things into a single > thread: could there be a way to expose which continuation to invoke > when returning from a routine? .pcc_call Sub, RetCont is implemented. S. e.g. imcc/t/syn/pcc_2.imc leo
