Data corruption unacceptable? I disagree.
I get the feeling people just aren't reading what's been written, or aren't keeping it all straight.
*User* and *program* data integrity is not our problem -- not only are we not guaranteeing that, I'd be fine with parrot actively corrupting the contents of shared data structures that are accessed without synchronization.
*Interpreter* data corruption is absolutely unacceptable, will not be tolerated, and whatever synchronization the interpreters need to do to make sure it doesn't happen.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
