Another object question

[Leopold Toetsch]

I've committed two additional object tests. The last one

  ok 25 - attribute values, inherited access meths

makes me wonder, ifn't such method functions should get a PMC of the 
class, for which the method was called, e.g.:

  Parrot_find_method_with_cache()
  ...
  if (method) {
    REG_PMC(4) = cur_class;           # or class in the plain case
    return method;
  }
The inherited get/set functions of that test need the class to access 
their attributes. Currently I pass in the classname as a parameter, but 
that seems to be suboptimal. It could of course be that the test is 
totally bogus ;)

Comments?
leo