The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20040229
    Welcome to the leapday summary. We'll crack straight on with
    perl6-internals

  Running up to release time
    As Leapday had been chosen as the release date for Parrot 0.1.0, the
    week was mostly spent getting things ready for release. A case in point
    was the PLATFORMS file which lists those platforms on which Parrot is
    known to compile and run, which (at the beginning of the week) was short
    several platforms and generally out of date. So everyone manned the
    pumps and sent in reports of success and failure. BTW, if you manage to
    get Parrot up and running (or even partially up and limping) on a
    platform that's not listed in PLATFORMS then [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    would be very pleased to hear from you.

    http://tinyurl.com/287f2

  Objects and time
    Dan announced that he'd trodden on one of the nasty bits of objects; the
    proper ordering of classes for initialization and destruction in the
    face of multiple inheritance. He announced that he was in the process of
    actively ignoring it for the time being and canvassed opinions about
    whether to delay the Leapday release in favour of fully
    specced/implemented objects or whether to make the 29th without objects,
    or some other choice. In the end we decided to still aim for the 29th,
    with objects in a 90% there state, but with big 'HERE BE DRAGONS'
    warnings plastered on the tricky edge cases. A little later Dan
    announced what would be there for the release (Multiple inheritance,
    attributes, object instantiation and method calls) and what wouldn't
    (monkeying with some things after subclassing/instantiation, method
    redispatch and fancy namespace lookups).

    As the week progressed, objects inched closer and closer to readiness,
    though at least one summarizer's heart was in his mouth as the week
    ebbed away. Would Dan get everything he'd promised working before the
    deadline? Tune in later on to find out.

    http://tinyurl.com/34db3

    http://tinyurl.com/2xuoa

  Feature Freeze
    On Wednesday, Leo Tötsch announced a feature slush (patches to add OO
    features were still being accepted) in anticipation of a release. The
    patch rate increased as people got on with fixing up failing tests on
    various platforms, improving documentation, and improving OO
    functionality. Not all the object patches were from Dan; chromatic got
    in on the act with a couple of tweaks to parrotobject.pmc...

    http://tinyurl.com/2u3kb

  Native PBC issues
    It turns out that, just at the moment, Parrot bytecode isn't actually
    platform independent. This will, of course, get fixed, but it's not
    Leo's top priority at present. He asked people who are running Parrot on
    64 bit and Big endian architectures to submit native_pbc test files (if
    you're on such an architecture, take a look at t/native_pbc/*.t for
    instructions, and the Parrot community will thank you for it).

    http://tinyurl.com/2fh5r

  Object Questions
    Simon Glover did some sterling work exercising the Object documentation
    and implementation, posting several bug reports and questions.

    http://tinyurl.com/3bnys

    http://tinyurl.com/yu9ce

  Ladies and Gentleman: Objects!
    On Wednesday, several full days before the release date, Dan announced
    that objects were done (well, everything that he promised would work
    did) and asked for people to start 'abusing it heavily'. Which they
    promptly did. There was applause too.

    http://tinyurl.com/2bsqv

  Next on the hit list
    Having got objects up, Dan immediately posted a list of desiderata for
    the next release but one. Is there no stopping him?

    http://tinyurl.com/38ymw

  Today we have naming of parts
    Will the madness never stop?

    Mitchell Charity spoke for everyone when he posted an extract from
    PDD15:

        What .NET calls an attribute parrot calls a property
        What .NET calls a property parrot calls an attribute

    Everyone shared the pain, though Paolo Molaro pointed out that it's not
    exactly accurate and the .NET name for a parrot attribute is 'field'
    (which is yet another term with wide variety of meanings when you think
    about it). Not being the biggest OO fan in the world, Dan swears he's
    just going to rename them Fred and Barney but not tell anyone which is
    which.

    http://tinyurl.com/24j36

  LANGUAGES.STATUS updates
    Mitchell also pointed out that LANGUAGES.STATUS was out of date and
    several languages which were supposed to be okay failed to work on his
    system. He asked for feedback to get it updated correctly.

    http://tinyurl.com/3xow7

  Inconsistent Parrot/IMCC behaviour
    Gregor Purdy found that Parrot was doing different things with the .pasm
    file generated from an .imc file by IMCC than it was when it ran the
    .imc file directly. Melvin Smith and Leo both agreed that it was a bug,
    but it's very hard to fix with the current incarnation of IMCC. IMCC2
    should (will) fix the issue. Leo provided a workaround to fix the
    generated .pasm though.

    http://tinyurl.com/2j5hn

  The Kakapo leaps
    Yay! Parrot 0.1.0 "Leaping Kakapo" got released at 2004022913:45:49 GMT.
    This is a big release, with Objects and multi-threading as well as a
    major documentation overhaul and a bunch of other good stuff. Anyone who
    suggests that I'm only really excited by this particular release because
    I came up with the code name.

    Pointing out that the Kakapo is a flightless, nearly extinct species of
    parrot is considered unsporting.

    http://tinyurl.com/3fbdo

Meanwhile, in perl6-language
  Perl 6? When?
    Aaron Sherman noted that Apocalypse 1 was published in 2001, and it made
    mention of Apocalypse 26. And we've seen all of six apocalypses. He
    wondered if there was anything that could be done to increase the
    apocalypse rate. As chromatic pointed out, no plan survives first
    contact with the enemy; it turns out that a lot of the theoretical
    apocalypses (one apocalypse per chapter of Programming Perl), aren't
    actually necessary for specifying the language to the point where we can
    start implementing.

    Larry also answered Aaron's concerns and noted that last year he had to
    take half a year off 'to participate in various non-optional gastric
    revisions'. He quickly discussed the outstanding chapters and RFCs and
    pointed out that a large amount of the work had already been done. Which
    is nice.

    Larry also showed us his outline of Apocalypse 12 which is apparently
    about a week away from the first alpha for the sixcabal. It looks rather
    promising (and it's rather easy to see why it's taken so long).

    http://tinyurl.com/ysf6g

    http://tinyurl.com/2ol2h -- Larry's big plan

    http://tinyurl.com/2aylx -- Apocalypse 12 outline

  Thinking about accessors
    John Williams wondered about how accessors will work with Perl 6
    objects. In particular he wondered about cases like:

        $foo.bar_attr += $z;
        $foo.bar_attr++;

    Things got a little complicated, indeed Larry muttered that there would
    be a delay to A12 because John had asked him to explain something that
    he hadn't figured out yet.

    http://tinyurl.com/367hy

  An interesting matching problem
    Austin Hastings came up with a neat little problem for matching.
    Consider an instrumented string class which carries information like
    'bold' and 'italic' or even the language of a substring. How would you
    write a search to match all the letters 'l' in french text. (Not a very
    realistic problem I know, but you'll have to bear with me).

    Larry responded with a neat idea involving "&", so you would write:

       /[l & <french>]/ 

    where french is presumably a block rule that makes a method call on the
    appropriate character.

    http://tinyurl.com/22ou8

  Exegesis 7
    Damian's Exegesis 7, dealing with the replacement for Perl 5's format,
    was published on Thursday. It's jolly good. Really. And you can use it
    now if you grab Perl6::Form from CPAN. This threw up a pile of questions
    about ambiguities, edge cases and all the other stuff that p6l does so
    well. The version of the exegesis at perl.com has already been updated
    to take some of these issues into account.

    http://tinyurl.com/2vuq9

Announcements, Apologies, Acknowledgements
    Whee! The Summary goes to the mailing lists before midnight on Monday.
    "Will I be able to keep up this dizzy pace?" I ask myself.

    If you find these summaries useful or enjoyable, please consider
    contributing to the Perl Foundation to help support the development of
    Perl. You might also like to send me feedback at
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], or drop by my website.

    http://donate.perl-foundation.org/ -- The Perl Foundation

    http://dev.perl.org/perl6/ -- Perl 6 Development site

    http://www.bofh.org.uk/ -- My website, "Just a Summary"

Reply via email to