On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:33:15PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 23:33, chromatic wrote:
>
> > With the improved object system in place, I've been porting the existing
> > SDL Parrot bindings.
>
> Here's a quick status update. With helpful suggestions from Jens and
> Allison, I've just finished porting the existing files in examples/sdl
> to the new libraries. They're a lot nicer.
This is probably a (dumb) parrot question rather than SDL, but I'd have
expected these:
> find_type app_type, 'SDL::App'
> .namespace [ 'MoveLogo::EventHandler' ]
to be more like
find_type app_type, 'SDL', 'App'
or: find_type app_type, [ 'SDL', 'App' ]
.namespace [ 'MoveLogo', 'EventHandler' ]
Would either/both of those work and you're just opting to have
double colons 'inside' a non-nested namespace name,
or am I misunderstanding how nested namespaces do/should/will work?
Tim.
