On Apr 9, 2004, at 8:07 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 4:19 PM +0200 4/9/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I've sent my patch in through RT--it's [perl #28405]!
Phew, that's huge. I'd really like to have smaller patches that do it step by step. But anyway, the patch must have been a lot of work so lets see and make the best out of it.
I'll add a "Wow" in here.
I've snipped all of Leo's concerns, not because I don't share them but because I do.
I'm in the process of crafting my (appropriately) long explanation in reply to Leo's concerns.
Cool. I'll wait. :)
I also have the concern that this moves over to Unicode-everywhere.
It does, in a sense, and I'll defend that. (And at some point I'll ask you for a clarification of your concerns to make sure that I answer them directly, since "Unicode" can mean different things--a character model, a standard, a set of encodings....)
We can hash that out after the other things get argued out. -- Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
