Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One other thing occurred to me, to save a few bytes: When upscaling, > rather than passing clength, we can pass (result->strlen + number of > bytes left in cstring).
If I read that correctly, s->strlen (or clength) is the desired length. - on creation a onebyte STRING is created with clength (-1) - on upscaling this is still the length which then get's doubled We could use (d + 1 + strlen_left) but this isn't worth the effort. > JEff leo