At 4:05 PM +0200 8/22/04, Mattia Barbon wrote:
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 11:00:10 +0200 Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 > Mattia Barbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 >   Nag: the dynext patch from the other week is still unapplied: is
 > there any problem with it or did it just fall through the cracks?

Which one? init/load split?

Yes. It wasn't clear if it was good or not.

I'll take a look at that one. Splitting init and load's a good idea in general, so there's a pretty good chance we'll put it in. (We may want to add in a third, thread_init, as well)
--
Dan


--------------------------------------it's like this-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk

Reply via email to