Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Won't your approach put every one of those things in its own register?
I've clearly stated that lexicals aka non-volatiles have distinct registers. > ... However, if a continuation restores registers to the data they > had when the continuation was taken, then all of the registers will > contain the things that exactly as the original allocator expects > them. Yes. We had that scheme until the indirect register frame addressing. It was: savetop invokecc restoretop It was too slow - remember a factor of 5! leo
