Luke Palmer wrote:
Frankly I think, I've presented a way to make continuations work correctly. I did *not* hear any technical or otherwise reasonable argument that it wouldn't work or that it's untenable, nothing, nada.
Well, since I (and I'm sure many others) have been skipping over a lot of messages in this thread, could you either restate your solution or give a pointer to your proposal message?
Subject: Lexicals, continuations, and register allocator Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004
You can add to the proposed work arounds:
c) don't use I,N,S registers, and return continuations restore register contents.
Thanks, Luke
leo
