Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
If I remember correctly, MS Visual Studio *will* emit errors for this (I used VS 6.0, a long time ago).Michael Walter wrote:
Uh, C89 is an ANSI/ISO C.
I'm not enough of a language lawyer to know when various features came into to the language, but
gcc -std=c89 test.c
does *NOT* warn about declaration ordering issues. At least not with gcc version 3.3.4 (Debian 1:3.3.4-6sarge1)
- Sam Ruby
Just to be clear - I have nothing against the policy that Parrot will be able to compiled on these compilers. I just want to shift more of the the burden from the victims to the perpetrator (me!).
- Sam Ruby
