On Fri Jun 08 06:53:46 2007, ptc wrote: > In the file config/inter/pmc.pm, there is the comment: > > # XXX:leo do we really need an interactive step for this > # user could deactivate vital PMCs like SArray > # so there would be tests needed, that check for vital classes > > This relates to a user prompt which asks the users which PMCs they > would like to include. Unfortunately, the user could deactivate vital > PMCs, so maybe this isn't such a good idea. This todo item needs to > be discussed and it needs to be decided how to resolve the (potential) > problem here.
Has there been any discussion of this? I've come to my point in the writing of unit tests for the config step classes that I'm about to turn to this step. If user-interactivity is not appropriate for this step, I could reformulate it as an 'auto' step. kid51
