On 02/12/2007, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 10:44:08AM +0100, Paul Cochrane wrote: > > ... and I only > > needed to switch off the warnings about a lack of C<use > > strict/warnings>. At present, this isn't a maintanence burden, but as > > soon as we get lots of nqp/perl6 files we will need to rethink how we > > handle them. I don't think it's worth worrying about just yet. > > I disagree. I think we'll quickly be accumulating a lot of Perl 6/NQP > files, and putting the nocritic lines in all of them is a bit of > a pain, as well as adjusting them all later. > > If it helps, we can start marking all such files with 'use v6;', and > then the critic (or its driver) can use that to decide if the file > should be checked. Or, if that's not good enough, then I'd at least > want to put the nocritic lines with the coda instead of at the head > of the file (if that's even possible).
Unfortunately, putting the nocritic lines at the end of the file with the coda doesn't work. I think marking the files with C<use v6;> would be really good (this syntax isn't recognised yet though, is it?), then I could filter which files should be passed through the relevant policies of Perl::Critic. Paul
