From: "James Keenan via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 10:46:15 -0700
On Sun Mar 16 10:02:32 2008, rgrjr wrote:
> I think it ought to happen, though I think Allison just wanted a ticket
> for updating existing PDDs, and not for a whole new PDD. I asked
> Allison for a clarification on 11-Mar in Will's "[oops; continuation
> 0xb6926320 of type 22 is trying to jump from runloop 15008 to runloop
> 1]" thread, and had been waiting for that.
>
> But I do agree that it ought to be a separate ticket. The underlying
> issue is still with us, but has outgrown the original ticket.
Okay. I will now close this ticket.
Fine by me.
For more granular tracking, I recommend that a separate RT be opened
for each existing PDD which needs updating.
Thank you very much.
kid51
I am not sure that separate tickets makes sense for what ought to be a
single coordinated change. But I will submit the first ticket so you
can look at it (though probably not for a while yet), and we can take it
from there.
-- Bob
