As far as I could see, it seems that the whole "n_operators" thing is no longer mentioned in pdd19.
if it's what Pm thinks, just a change from ".pragma n_operators" to ".n_operators", then that should be added. kjs On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:07:49AM +0100, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:06 PM, via RT Will Coleda wrote > > > From PDD19: > > > > > > =item .pragma n_operators [deprecated] > > > > does this mean that by default all ops will have the n_ prefix by > default? > > That would imply some variants of these ops are removed (namely, the > > non-n_-prefixed ones). > > > > I guess what my question is, what's the reason for removing this? > > I think all this means is that the pragma itself is deprecated. > I would presume that the n_operators remain, and that programs can > continue to generate both n_ and non-n_ opcodes as needed. > > Pm >
