From: "Andrew Whitworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:36:16 -0400
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Bob Rogers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But there's a concat_p_p_p op, so "+" is ambiguous. In general, it
> seems best to use distinct tokens for distinct operations, rather than
> depending on register types, so that extending the set of register types
> for a given op doesn't introduce ambiguities by the back door.
I forgot about that opcode, so "+" is out. We don't have another use
for "..", do we have another one for "~"?
bxor (binary XOR). ".." seems unproblematic.
-- Bob
