Forgot to forward to list:

On Thu Oct 02 18:37:05 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed Oct 01 16:09:41 2008, julianalbo wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I see a more generic problem. Several modules add lib links to the
> > parrot executable. Makes sense to link static libraries if that is the
> > intention, but is not convenient to link dynamics that can be, and
> > are, dynamically linked at runtime. This way adds unneeded dependences
> > to the binary packages.
> 
> [snip]
> 
> Your point is very interesting.  However, if you believe this issue
> merits more extended discussion, I would recommend you open up a new RT
> ticket, perhaps in the [RFC] category (or [RFP] or whatever it's called).
> 
> I would like to keep the discussion in *this* RT focused on the issues
> Carl raised with respect to config step auto::pcre.
> 
> Thank you very much.
> kid51


Reply via email to