On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:18:40PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote: > (I suppose technically we should stop calling this a "stack trace" since > it's not a stack. But "return continuation chain trace" is just too > verbose.)
"backtrace" Pm
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:18:40PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote: > (I suppose technically we should stop calling this a "stack trace" since > it's not a stack. But "return continuation chain trace" is just too > verbose.)
"backtrace" Pm