On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Klaas-Jan Stol via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed Jul 02 22:50:45 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> This is a good, bite-sized task for Whiteknight. > > I wonder whether doing macro-magic for this improves readability of the > code; it's hard as it is without analyzing the text replacements of the > c preprocessor. > > Also, given that IMCC will be replaced at some point, is it worth doing > this task? > > If the general consensus to the above questions is "no", we can reject > this ticket.
This ticket has been very low priority on my to-do list for exactly this reason. I'm not sure it's going to help code readability (although I could probably squeeze some more efficiency out of it by reducing the number of realloc calls). I also don't want to be squeezing too many changes into IMCC that don't have a major benefit when we're planning to replace IMCC wholesale. If other people say we should reject this, I certainly won't complain. --Andrew Whitworth
