On Tuesday 20 January 2009 07:27:53 Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 08:35:26PM -0800, chromatic via RT wrote:
> > I've done most of this in r35787, but we can't get rid of n_neg entirely
> > until someone updates PCT and NQP not to use it for prefix:- rules. I
> > poked at that, but couldn't make them work.
> What's the replacement opcode for n_neg ?
If we remove n_neg, the replacement is likely a two-step operation:
clone $P1, $P2
neg $P1
-- c
