At 09:56 AM 8/26/00 +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > It looks like we need to be able to override operations on arrays, have
> > multi-dimensional arrays, and do some rather odd slicing operations that
> > give values still linked to the original matrices.
> >
> > Has anyone asked for complex number support yet?
>
>It's hidden in one or two lines of RFC 116 I think ;)
Along with an amazing amount of other stuff. That RFC makes my head hurt.
(I hope it goes in... :)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) c . soeller
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Nathan Torkington
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Nathan Torkington
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Nathan Torkington
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: T... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Some PDL issues (was R... c . soeller
- Re: Some PDL issues (was R... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) c . soeller
- Re: multidim. containers Jeremy Howard
- Re: multidim. containers Dan Sugalski
- Re: multidim. containers John Porter
- Re: multidim. containers Christian Soeller
- Re: multidim. containers Dan Sugalski
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Tom Christiansen
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Nathan Torkington
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: T... Tom Christiansen
- Re: Some PDL issues (was Re: Test) Karl Glazebrook
