Bart Lateur wrote: > Personally, I would like to have Larry's fiat *before* trying to iron > out the incompatibilities. It could be that you throw away something > that Larry would approve of, and keep something he doesn't like. I'd vote to go for what we think is the best compromise. If Larry interacts as part of the discussion leading there that's fine. We should have some trust in our own judgement. Christian
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Dan Sugalski
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Christian Soeller
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Jim Edwards
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing an... Christian Soeller
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexi... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Bart Lateur
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... c . soeller
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix in... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Damian Conway
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Christian Soeller
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Damian Conway
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Dan Sugalski
- Re: Access to the perl6 parser Damian Conway
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicing Buddha Buck
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicing Jeremy Howard
- Re: Proposed RFC for matrix indexing and slicing Nathan Wiger