Buddha Buck wrote:

> Would you go for:
> 
> @a[$first;*];
> @a[*;$last];
> @a[$first;*;$last]?
> 
> Say yes, and I'll add it tonight!

Nice! I'd go as far as implying a trailing ';*' if omitted.

> 
> I'm unsure if @a[*;$middle;*] has any reasonable interpretation.

Probably just croak. Unless somebody can give a good example why it
should be useful.

  Christian

Reply via email to