Buddha Buck wrote: > Would you go for: > > @a[$first;*]; > @a[*;$last]; > @a[$first;*;$last]? > > Say yes, and I'll add it tonight! Nice! I'd go as far as implying a trailing ';*' if omitted. > > I'm unsure if @a[*;$middle;*] has any reasonable interpretation. Probably just croak. Unless somebody can give a good example why it should be useful. Christian
- Re: a syntax derived from constant-time... Nathan Wiger
- Re: a syntax derived from constant-time... David L. Nicol
- Re: a syntax derived from constant-time... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: a syntax derived from constant-time... c . soeller
- Re: n-dim matrices Karl Glazebrook
- Re: n-dim matrices Buddha Buck
- Re: n-dim matrices Karl Glazebrook
- Re: n-dim matrices Buddha Buck
- Re: n-dim matrices Christian Soeller
- Re: n-dim matrices Buddha Buck
- Re: n-dim matrices Christian Soeller
- Re: n-dim matrices Karl Glazebrook
- Re: n-dim matrices David L. Nicol
- Re: n-dim matrices Jeremy Howard
- Re: n-dim matrices Christian Soeller
- Re: n-dim matrices Karl Glazebrook
- Re: n-dim matrices Jeremy Howard
- Re: n-dim matrices Buddha Buck
- Re: n-dim matrices Christian Soeller
- Matrix, array, or tensor? (was Re: n-di... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Matrix, array, or tensor? (was Re: ... Karl Glazebrook