Re: RFC 196 (v1) More direct syntax for hashes

[Nathan Torkington]

Michael G Schwern writes:
> Okay, the example says on thing and the text of the proposal says
> another.

Sorry, I thought you were talking about a different section of code.
I'll resubmit tomorrow.

> So you're proposing that C<sort %hash> act like C<map { $_ =>
> $hash{$_} } sort keys %hash>?  I can live with that.  Just clear it up
> in the RFC.

That's what I'm saying.

Nat