Jeremy Howard wrote: > So where is mv(), you ask? If you use the 'reorder' syntax, but don't > specify all of the dimensions in the list ref, then the remaining dimensions > are added in order: That sounds good. I'd say why not also allow the mv syntax? It is syntactically different from the others, may be the least often used variant but then there are N+1 ways to do it ;) But no strong feelings either way... Christian
- Re: RFC 272 (v1) Arrays: transpose() Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 272 (v1) Arrays: transpose() Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 272 (v1) Arrays: transpose() Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 272 (v1) Arrays: transpose() c . soeller
- Re: RFC 272 (v1) Arrays: transpose() Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 272 (v1) Arrays: transpose() Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 272 (v1) Arrays: transpose() Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 272 (v1) Arrays: transpo... Karl Glazebrook
- Re: RFC 272 (v1) Arrays: transpo... c . soeller
- Re: RFC 272 (v1) Arrays: transpo... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 272 (v1) Arrays: transpose() c . soeller
- Re: RFC 272 (v1) Arrays: transpose() Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 272 (v1) Arrays: transpose() c . soeller