On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 12:36:42PM -0700, Peter Scott wrote: > If you use a switch statement and want implicit rethrow (and I do), then > your exception handler somehow has to look inside the switch to see if an > exception was handled. Even if that's possible, it implies a level of > incestuousness that isn't good; what if the programmer puts something > besides a switch in the catch/else block? Is it supposed to look inside > that too to figure out if the exception was caught? Let the programmer tell Perl that the exception was handled. I suggested in another email that "undef $@" would do it. But that's just an idea. -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Toward an omnibus Perl 6 Exceptions RFC, v0.1. Tony Olekshy
- Re: Toward an omnibus Perl 6 Exceptions RFC, v0.1... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Toward an omnibus Perl 6 Exceptions RFC, v0.1... Tony Olekshy
- Re: Toward an omnibus Perl 6 Exceptions RFC, ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Toward an omnibus Perl 6 Exceptions R... Peter Scott
- Re: Toward an omnibus Perl 6 Exceptio... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Toward an omnibus Perl 6 Exc... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Toward an omnibus Perl 6 Exceptions RFC, ... Peter Scott
- Re: Toward an omnibus Perl 6 Exceptions RFC, v0.1... Peter Scott
- Re: Toward an omnibus Perl 6 Exceptions RFC, ... Tony Olekshy
- Re: Toward an omnibus Perl 6 Exceptions R... Peter Scott
- Re: Toward an omnibus Perl 6 Exceptio... Tony Olekshy
- Re: Toward an omnibus Perl 6 Exceptions RFC, ... Tony Olekshy
- Re: Toward an omnibus Perl 6 Exceptions RFC, v0.1... Peter Scott
- Re: Toward an omnibus Perl 6 Exceptions RFC, ... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Toward an omnibus Perl 6 Exceptions R... Peter Scott