<quote>
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Olekshy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 8:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exception stack: let's use the @@ list.
> Ok, uncle.
Thanks.
</quote>
Hey, when your right...
<quote>
> I think C<throw> was already going to operate on $@ by default, what
> about C<warn>?
Throw can't take no arguments because its a constructor, not a function.
</quote>
If $@ always contains an exceptions we don't need to construct one to throw.
So throw:
no arguments but somthing in $@ => throw $@
no arguments and nothing in $@ => runtime error
Am I just being thick here?
<quote>
warn, no arguments? If $@ it should do $@." at line blah file blah", and
if !$@ it should do "warning at line blah file blah.".
</quote>
Yah! That would realy nice.
-Corwin
