--On 23.08.2000 10:15 Uhr -0600 Tony Olekshy wrote:
> This form is documented as proposed in RFC 88:
>
> catch $@->{severity} eq "Fatal" => { ... }
>
> and I'm adding this to the next version, as a convenience method:
>
> catch $@->fatal => { ... }
Agreed. That one is better than the different class :-)
--
Markus Peter - SPiN GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: On the case for exception-based error han... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-based error... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based error... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Glenn Linderman
- RE: On the case for exception-based error handling. Brust, Corwin
- RE: On the case for exception-based error handling. Peter Scott
- RE: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-based error han... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based error han... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Tony Olekshy
