At 09:25 PM 8/10/00 -0600, Tony Olekshy wrote: > > Hmm, I thought I saw another exception RFC pass by. > > Yup, RFC 88, Tony Olekshy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Could you two folks get together and hash this out. > >RFC 88 goes to some trouble to seperate exception handling from >exception objects. It doesn't care how exception objects are >numbered, labelled, or titled; it only cares how they stringify >and isa. I believe Chaim was referring to RFC 63. >I will however be delighted to participate in the discussion of >RFCs related to Perl 6's canonical exception class. We should >probably move to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirected there. -- Peter Scott Pacific Systems Design Technologies
