Re: RFC 120 (v2) Implicit counter in for statements, possibly $#.

[Jonathan Scott Duff]

On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 10:12:02AM -0500, Christopher J. Madsen wrote:
> I would say you can't use implicit $_ with an index; you use explicit
> $_ instead.

Sounds like "Don't Do That" to me :-)

> 
>     foreach $_ $index (@array) { ... }
> 
> It's only 3 characters, and it makes for a nice consistant syntax.

Yep, but it might also be a source of confusion too.  There's no way
to help the programmer realize that they've screwed up when they do.

        for $index (@array) {
           print "$_ is at position $index\n";          # Oops!
        }

In this example, the programmer may realize his mistake when he sees
" is at position 0", but in the real world, the body of the loop may
be *much* more complicated.  How do we help the programmer when he
screws up?  

-Scott
-- 
Jonathan Scott Duff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]