>Solve the larger problem: permit method calls in qq() strings.
You mean outside of @{[ ... ]}, eh? :=},
I think Larry *might* have said something about making this work.
I'm just a bit concerned with the general notion that functions would under
some circumstances trigger in qq guys. It's a bit odd to explain that
things like abs() for $n+3 won't work, but $o->foo() would. Then again,
it's already curious with $a[$n+3]. :-)
--tom
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ ope... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ ope... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ ope... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 138 (v1) Eliminate =~ operator. Tom Christiansen
- working mnemonic for =~ David L. Nicol
